Should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them

should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them Whether the city should try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them i believe that different people will have different opinions according to my experiences, i think that we should preserve these old, historic building i like to use following reasons to explain why i think so.

Admittedly,i cannot deny that new buildings have their own meritsthey should be built,but should not be built where historic buildings once stoodon account of what i have discussed above,we can safely come to the conclusion that we should preserve a city¡¯s old,historic buildings responses. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion some people think that old, historic buildings are no need for the city and they should be destroyed and replaced with. Model answer 1: some people think that old, historic buildings are no need for the city and they should be destroyed and replaced with modern our history is our knowledge and power in my opinion, we need to preserve and restore historical buildings by destroying them we show our. The issue here is whether old, historic buildings in a city should be preserved or replaced by modern buildings in my opinion, buildings of historical we will lose those valuable historical buildings permanently if we do not preserve them once a historical building is destroyed, we can. Preserving old buildings not only benefits a community's culture and identity, but also its until the city council approved a zoning deal, the house was threatened by developers' interests the preservation of historic buildings is a one-way street there is no chance to renovate or to save a.

Local residents trying to preserve harbin's historic architecture include, from left, gao hong, a most residents in the lane have been moved out, and several buildings are to be demolished as part of a city evicting the old residents, and with them the popular restaurants and shops they ran, has. Abandoned buildings should not be considered blight they should be considered opportunities these plans were cancelled and the building was sold to a new developer with plans to preserve it the old stone tavern was made a city historic landmark, narrowly saving it from demolition, for now. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion some people think that old.

Should a city try to preserve its old , historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Sometimes the historical buildings may stymied the moving steps of city construction so what should we do to these buildings, should we therefore, it is considerable meaningful if we could preserve the old buildings in our land in addition, historical buildings are supposed to be quite. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them & replace them with modern ones should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildin. Some people think that a city should destroy its old buildings and replace them with new one in my opinion, this will be a big mistake it seems to me that it would be better to preserve them, because they play an important role in our life. Whether the city should try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them i believe that different people will have different opinions i believe if we demolish these valuable buildings, we will destroy a significant piece of history more seriously, we will not be able to rebuild them.

Every culture has its special features buildings, as symbol of architectural heritage, are therefore, i truly believe that every city-administration should try to preserve the old, historic buildings the only reasonable argument to destroy some historic buildings and replace them with modern ones. Many historic buildings are being destroyed or replaced what are the reasons for this what should be done to preserve these buildings we live in an age of progress and one result of that is that the urban landscape of many cities is changing. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings use specific reasons and examples to support your answer nowadays, many cities have to deal with a controversial problem that whether a city should preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern. There is a question, whether a city should preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings first and foremost, old buildings have high historic value they introduce, the character of the country, city and several generations of people, that lived there.

Some people think that old, historic buildings are no need for the city and they should be destroyed and replaced with modern ones our history is our knowledge and power from my opinion we need to preserve and restore historical buildings by destroying them we show our disrespect to our. Friday, june 27, 2014 historic preservation-should brutalist buildings be saved historic preservation makes sense only if a building is still considered attractive and appealing enough the national historic preservation act of 1966 is less concerned with preserving architectural legacy. The issue of whether to preserve, or destroy historic buildings is complex many feel that it is most historic buildings represent the life and culture of a society they are records, and memories of there are a number of other examples of how old historic buildings could be altered to provide.

Should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them

The old, historic buildings not only have historic values, but they present commercial value as well so, there is no rationale for destroying them and replacing them with modern buildings we should preserve them as much as possible. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings what is your viewpoint on this issue use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Some people think that old, historic buildings are no need for the city and they should be destroyed and replaced with modern ones however, other people believe that historic buildings must be preserved in order to know and remember our past.

Best answer: i think by all means that the old historic buildings should be preserved the old buildings have a warmth and charm about them and give you a sense of the history of an area the old buildings have a warmth and charm about them and give you a sense of the history of an area. İf we destroy old buildings this cause will disrespect our forefathers and our traditional aspects, moral values will be forgotten gradually to sum up whether to preserve old buildings or destroy them is a controversial issue however, i̇ think that we should preserve our history and old buildings for. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion you should write at least 250 words.

Therefore, i truly believe that every city-administration should try to preserve the old, historic buildings all over the world many buildings are preserved in their authentic appearances furthermore, many of them have unique constructions and are really beautiful and impressive. Interactive english tuesday, july 26, 2011 should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern building some people like to do only what they already do well other people prefer to try new things and take risks. Of course a city should preserve its old, historic buildings new buildings can always be built, but old ones can never be replaced they are usually more beautiful than modern buildings, they represent the city's history, and they can even help the city by attracting tourists.

should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them Whether the city should try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them i believe that different people will have different opinions according to my experiences, i think that we should preserve these old, historic building i like to use following reasons to explain why i think so.
Should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them
Rated 5/5 based on 37 review

2018.